City Council Debates Competing Measure, Upholds Planning Commission Denial, Hears Public Testimony on Stephanie Inn Appeal
This summary was generated by AI, which occasionally makes mistakes, especially spelling names. Not an official record, for informational purposes only.
Competing Measure to Initiative I-2024-1
The City Council meeting began with a detailed discussion led by City Attorney Ashley Driscoll regarding the competing measure to initiative I-2024-1. Driscoll provided an overview of the initiative, which is a charter amendment requiring voter approval to incur debt for non-emergency projects. The Council had previously expressed concerns about ambiguities in the initiative measure, such as the lack of definitions for "debt approval level," "project," and "non-emergency."
Driscoll explained that the Council had delegated authority to Mayor Barb Knop to work with staff to prepare a competing ballot title. The competing measure aims to clarify when voter approval is necessary for incurring debt and to counteract the ambiguities in the initiative measure. The Council discussed the proposed charter amendment language, which specifies that voter approval is required for issuing general obligation bonds that increase property taxes.
Councilor Lisa Kerr raised concerns about the use of the term "ad valorem taxes" and suggested that it be clarified as "property taxes" to make it more understandable for voters. Driscoll agreed to consult with bond counsel on this matter. The Council decided to address these concerns and finalize the ballot title at their next meeting.